There has been much discussion about the forces that keep the universe, as we observe it, expanding. Like an explosion the force of the explosion causes the matter to accelerate with the force of the explosion, then to expend the inertia energy through the resistance of space and medium and then become the influence of gravitational force to bring the matter back together. We see this clearly with the experience of a hand grenade, fire works, a speed boat when the motor stops. and automobile going up and down hill. As the force of energy subsides the influence of gravity takes over and brings all thing to rest.
So if we observe the behavior of the universe, we see an ever expanding universe that seem to be accelerating, faster and faster. They are trying to explain this as the influence of additional energy, (Dark Energy). I cannot understand Dark Energy, nor can I comprehend its material substance, nor can I observe it. To me it is a mathematical dream. If I try to observe what is happening, it would appear that we are still experiencing the initial transfer of inertia of the initial explosion, to the matter of the explosion. Look at the fire out there. Isn't that what an explosion looks like down close.
We also have to take a look at the environment of the Universe, in relation to what we experience on earth. On earth matter loses energy and falls back to earth with the force of gravity. Well in case you have not noticed the universe does not have anything like earth influencing its gravitational characteristics. As a matter of fact the gravitational relationship between space objects of similar construct is quite random. Flying around in space resulting from your last departure could land you into a new gravitational field as you travel and cause you to accelerate toward the most powerful center of gravity you encounter. Well if you are traveling with the inertia of an explosion, you could be going very fast, perhaps losing some of your pep from the last explosion and accelerating to another center of gravity, where you will meet up with a great number of fellow travelers, and end up colliding into another black hole and being re-exploded back into space.
So it is with particles large and small. They travel from one black hole to another, with great speed, of varying size, influenced by all the laws of physics and chemistry, in a sea of chaos.
In as much as there seems to be no limitations to the distance and time available to travel, we could be observing a very large universe of a very small part of an ever larger universe, with galaxies, and whole universes colliding in chaos beyond our observable universe. As some have observed there is no reason to not to observe that the limitless time and distance we can measure can be infinite. What we observe could be a micro molecule of hair on an ever larger pussy cat, which is part of a universe wherein it is the grain of sand on a beach somewhere out there. In the other direction we may contain in our hair that was cut off the last time we went to the barber, whole solar systems of atoms and molecules within each particle of hair that was burned in the garbage. There is simply no telling. There are no apparent observable limits.
Have you ever tried to grab a piece of space? Have you ever tried to make or eliminate a moment of time. I had a professor once, who stated that time and space are relative. What he explained was, that time is simply a relative method in the mind for us to associate the sequence of events that occur in succession. Think of a ball rolling down an inclined plain. So many positions, all in sequence, but individual moments of existence as it falls. What happened to the reality of each circumstance as the ball rolled down the hill. Are they still real? Is each moment of position still in existence, regardless of its current position at rest. Either the circumstance is real, or it is not real. Does time effect the reality of the circumstance? The ball could not be at rest where it is unless it went through all those circumstances along its' path. We observe it in the "present". Do we think about the succession of circumstance while it stands still? How long has it been still? Can we observe all the bumps and bruises on the ball as it fell. Did we observe them? Are we aware of them? We watch the ball fall through "space" as it traveled down the plain. It went from place to place along the path. Sometimes it went faster, it bumped up and down, and then came to rest. Our brain can separate these circumstances and compare them in terms of time and space. This makes relating the experience to all other experiences, as to what, when, where, how. But can we really explain in absolute terms as to why??
So we observe the universe in human terms, with the limitation of the human mind. We can forget the limitations sometimes and simply massage our imagination to make the universe fit into our human thinking method. Not always. The universe is as it is, without the need for human mastery. It does not even know what we are or what we are thinking about it. Our theories are simply the imagination creating some possible explanation in our terms. Science becomes Art. Science becomes the illusions of the Artist. The challenge is to determine what is fact, against the limitations of our observations.
Dark energy, is the name for the current unexplained observation which we filter with the limitations and genius of the human mind. I see the simpler explanation. It is all conjecture that will be changed as certain as the theories of Plato, and all that came before us. Those who come after us will compliment our ingenuity and explain to their generation the error of our ways. So in a sense my two cents worth of observation is a good as any other. We are all far off from observing the real universe with our simple minds and our simple tools. Do we learn and know more as time goes on. maybe. But then with the infinite appearance of time and space, there is much to learn as we observe greater phenomenon down the line.
Dark Energy? Have fun. It will probably not be the final answer. If I cannot comprehend it, does not mean it is not real.
So if we observe the behavior of the universe, we see an ever expanding universe that seem to be accelerating, faster and faster. They are trying to explain this as the influence of additional energy, (Dark Energy). I cannot understand Dark Energy, nor can I comprehend its material substance, nor can I observe it. To me it is a mathematical dream. If I try to observe what is happening, it would appear that we are still experiencing the initial transfer of inertia of the initial explosion, to the matter of the explosion. Look at the fire out there. Isn't that what an explosion looks like down close.
We also have to take a look at the environment of the Universe, in relation to what we experience on earth. On earth matter loses energy and falls back to earth with the force of gravity. Well in case you have not noticed the universe does not have anything like earth influencing its gravitational characteristics. As a matter of fact the gravitational relationship between space objects of similar construct is quite random. Flying around in space resulting from your last departure could land you into a new gravitational field as you travel and cause you to accelerate toward the most powerful center of gravity you encounter. Well if you are traveling with the inertia of an explosion, you could be going very fast, perhaps losing some of your pep from the last explosion and accelerating to another center of gravity, where you will meet up with a great number of fellow travelers, and end up colliding into another black hole and being re-exploded back into space.
So it is with particles large and small. They travel from one black hole to another, with great speed, of varying size, influenced by all the laws of physics and chemistry, in a sea of chaos.
In as much as there seems to be no limitations to the distance and time available to travel, we could be observing a very large universe of a very small part of an ever larger universe, with galaxies, and whole universes colliding in chaos beyond our observable universe. As some have observed there is no reason to not to observe that the limitless time and distance we can measure can be infinite. What we observe could be a micro molecule of hair on an ever larger pussy cat, which is part of a universe wherein it is the grain of sand on a beach somewhere out there. In the other direction we may contain in our hair that was cut off the last time we went to the barber, whole solar systems of atoms and molecules within each particle of hair that was burned in the garbage. There is simply no telling. There are no apparent observable limits.
Have you ever tried to grab a piece of space? Have you ever tried to make or eliminate a moment of time. I had a professor once, who stated that time and space are relative. What he explained was, that time is simply a relative method in the mind for us to associate the sequence of events that occur in succession. Think of a ball rolling down an inclined plain. So many positions, all in sequence, but individual moments of existence as it falls. What happened to the reality of each circumstance as the ball rolled down the hill. Are they still real? Is each moment of position still in existence, regardless of its current position at rest. Either the circumstance is real, or it is not real. Does time effect the reality of the circumstance? The ball could not be at rest where it is unless it went through all those circumstances along its' path. We observe it in the "present". Do we think about the succession of circumstance while it stands still? How long has it been still? Can we observe all the bumps and bruises on the ball as it fell. Did we observe them? Are we aware of them? We watch the ball fall through "space" as it traveled down the plain. It went from place to place along the path. Sometimes it went faster, it bumped up and down, and then came to rest. Our brain can separate these circumstances and compare them in terms of time and space. This makes relating the experience to all other experiences, as to what, when, where, how. But can we really explain in absolute terms as to why??
So we observe the universe in human terms, with the limitation of the human mind. We can forget the limitations sometimes and simply massage our imagination to make the universe fit into our human thinking method. Not always. The universe is as it is, without the need for human mastery. It does not even know what we are or what we are thinking about it. Our theories are simply the imagination creating some possible explanation in our terms. Science becomes Art. Science becomes the illusions of the Artist. The challenge is to determine what is fact, against the limitations of our observations.
Dark energy, is the name for the current unexplained observation which we filter with the limitations and genius of the human mind. I see the simpler explanation. It is all conjecture that will be changed as certain as the theories of Plato, and all that came before us. Those who come after us will compliment our ingenuity and explain to their generation the error of our ways. So in a sense my two cents worth of observation is a good as any other. We are all far off from observing the real universe with our simple minds and our simple tools. Do we learn and know more as time goes on. maybe. But then with the infinite appearance of time and space, there is much to learn as we observe greater phenomenon down the line.
Dark Energy? Have fun. It will probably not be the final answer. If I cannot comprehend it, does not mean it is not real.